عمومِ بلویٰ کی تطبیقی شرائط۔ ایک تحقیقی جائزہ
Keywords:
General Affliction, Islamic Law, Contemporary Jurisprudential IssuesAbstract
General affliction (Umūm al-Balwā) is considered to be among seven reasons for mitigation in Islamic law. It is defined by Muslim jurists as conceding an impermissible practice becoming unavoidable for people at large to an extent that nobody gets rid of it. Keeping in view the consequences of this principle they have provided with all necessary details of it. The most important condition for application of this rule is that impermissibility of the issue that had become General affliction must not be established by divine text. Furthermore, state of necessity must be factual not fanciful. They have clearly stated that this principle brings mitigation only where necessity is not limited to some people but it must be prevailed in society. The use of gelatin derived from pig may be permissible on two grounds; principle of denaturation and principle of General affliction.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
License Terms (CC BY 4.0)
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits anyone to:
-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
Under the following condition:
-
Attribution — Appropriate credit must be given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license must be provided, and any changes made must be indicated. This must be done in a reasonable manner but not in any way that suggests endorsement by the author(s) or the journal.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The journal supports the open dissemination of scholarly research while maintaining ethical publishing standards.
For full license details, visit:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
